An Example
The following example output was generated using the standard EMME/2 Winnipeg demonstration data bank.
Since in the Winnipeg network the transit times depend on the auto times, those were copied into a link user data item and the transit time functions were modified accordingly.
Then the macro transfer was run twice in a row, adding the line-to-line transfer structures to the nodes 423 and 454. Figure 3 shows the details of the line itinerary around node 423 before running the macro.
Figure 3: Line itineraries at transfer node 423.
Figure 4 shows the transfer structure at node 445 generated with the macro. In order to graphically display the structure, the macro was calLED with the option to ``stagger'' the dummy nodes, instead of ``hiding'' them behind the transfer node.
Figure 4: Transfer structure at node 423.
Next the standard assignment was run again on the modified network and the resulting transit segment volumes were compared with the original ones, in order to verify that the route choice had not changed. Note that very small c






